Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C0AF18366 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40858 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2015 11:07:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 40787 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2015 11:07:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 40775 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2015 11:07:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:07:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E5A99180251 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:07:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.193 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.193 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZR2_irCJ3ZtF for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4220820927 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfv8 with SMTP id fv8so29809489wic.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:07:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sALsnI6/OzijJ0MuO9R8dtvl35XqbXaZuYvuEaGjD9w=; b=M6gMQGekDm/LjyNpB0mFrrSkk0bK0ynrRC0wmtE4Hna3uCq+eGtpZQSQIQ81a/Zzvw jljSpWLSJtYiGnoE0tqdu4N/Xd9GXiV8aR1leGmuNqEQ+wx3Zghu4H0lPTzT9Jn+xJL5 mLJU5JooN6+/ycT1gU+CQP2s85Ijdim+RcIKBO2RysbFUBdhsYYEWPiKXcZ7sl6qZuF2 3bjrZqkKIpFYCflYe4zAeqt9aaSqX4UjSO53JQtqJQy4swfMmxT5+f1SUxhmlMDFO/6L QCsNKXZntPNtBmzybcYTtbHGnIq2mxSmLWHod9JYW3OIyUlkwlXMysvRqjGWRau2H45U bWzw== X-Received: by 10.194.60.179 with SMTP id i19mr1108825wjr.135.1446635256951; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:07:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.36.226.98] ([80.169.137.63]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id at4sm1026294wjc.9.2015.11.04.03.07.35 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:07:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: FIQL query validation To: users@cxf.apache.org References: <1446223511331-5762439.post@n5.nabble.com> <5633A381.8040103@gmail.com> <5633A3D1.5030809@gmail.com> <1446469040121-5762481.post@n5.nabble.com> <5637D38A.9030506@gmail.com> <1446634336496-5762553.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Sergey Beryozkin Message-ID: <5639E6EE.2040804@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:07:26 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1446634336496-5762553.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Thanks for experimenting with it, I've been actually keeping this thread in the 'priority' line because may be we can have Beanspector producing some default case-insensitive line that would be optionally used without the user having to build the map manually (unless aliases are used). Besides, I'm still planning to introduce an interface for more matches to be possible in principle, should the application wish to do it, example, from "supplierCod" (a user forgot to type 'e') or "supplierCodee" (a user typed an extra 'e'), etc, to "supplierCode" Cheers, Sergey On 04/11/15 10:52, Diether wrote: > That is actually a great idea. I just tried it and it works fine. > Seems like I was seriously overcomplicating things :-) > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/FIQL-query-validation-tp5762439p5762553.html > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >