cxf-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maarten Boekhold <boekh...@gmx.com>
Subject Re: Consolidating on a single framework, CXF good fit for this use-case?
Date Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:21:45 GMT
Hi,

When you say "CXF supports the jetty transport", is that for incoming 
(eg as an HTTP Server) or outgoing (WS/REST requests) calls, or both?

Maarten

On 2015-01-15 19:09, Christian Schneider wrote:
> CXF Should be a good fit.
>
> I suggest to use Jetty for the embedded web server. CXF 2.x as well as 
> 3.x support the jetty http transport. Obviously this means that you 
> have jetty as a dependency.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On 15.01.2015 15:48, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
>>
>> What I'm still unsure about is what to use for embedded web server. 
>> CXF 2.7.8doesn't seem to offer anything here. However I notice  in 
>> the CXF 3.0.3distribution that there's a Jetty ServerEngine class and 
>> a Netty ServerEngineclass. I can't find any  documentation on this 
>> however.
>>
>> I'm asking the community therefore:
>> - is CXF a good fit for this?
>> - do I need to pull in a separate dependency for an embedded HTTP(S) 
>> Server?
>>
>> Maarten
>
>


Mime
View raw message