Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Message-ID: <52989A80.4090103@spudsoft.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:45:36 +0000
From: Jim Talbut <jtalbut@spudsoft.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exception when using two separate Spring contexts both using
 Jackson
References: <52985892.1010804@spudsoft.co.uk> <529872B7.20703@spudsoft.co.uk>
 <52987699.6040108@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52987699.6040108@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 29/11/2013 11:12, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for the update,
>
> I was concerned about
>
>  >> java.lang.NullPointerException: null
>  >>      at
>  >>
> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.tl.ThreadLocalProviders.getContextResolver(ThreadLocalProviders.java:50)
>
>
> should we still investigate it ? I'm just not exactly sure how a thread
> local cache can be affected such that NPE is thrown, even though there
> were issues with Bus references before your fix.
>
> May the following sequence can explain: the thread creates a context,
> two tests are started, the thread finishes one test, clears a context,
> and now finishes the 2nd test, but the context has gone. This can
> explain it. If you think it does not then please create a test project
> for me to investigate it further
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
It has to be something like that, but I'm not sure what Spring/JUnit/CXF 
would have cleared.
The other thing that still confuses me is that I would have expected the 
BusFactory.setDefault to affect things on the thread on which it is run, 
but the exception comes from the server thread (which should have an 
independent bus).

Anyway, I'm happy that the fix works and, whilst I think it would be 
good for you to document any limitation here, I can't quite think how 
you could have done that in a way that I would have found - so the 
existence of this email thread is probably as good as anything.

If I get the chance I will produce a test case, but it's not a priority.

Thanks.

Jim