cxf-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: NPE on MessageModeInInterceptor when sending empty SOAPBody
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:33:07 GMT

On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Glen Mazza <gmazza@talend.com> wrote:

> Not having a SOAP body would seem to violate rule R2710 of the WS-I Basic Profile (http://www.ws-i.org/profiles/basicprofile-1.1.html#Operation_Signatures).

This was something that was updated in BP 2.0:

http://ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-2.0-2010-11-09.html#Operation_Signatures

which allows the body elements to be non-unique as long as the was:Action headers are unique.


Dan



> 
> Glen
> 
> On 02/04/2013 10:21 AM, Jesus Castillo wrote:
>> Hi Aki,
>> 
>> the information about what service to invoke is not in the SOAP body but in
>> the SOAP headers.
>> Hence the request has an empty SOAP body.
>> 
>> Rgds,
>> 
>> Jesus.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/NPE-on-MessageModeInInterceptor-when-sending-empty-SOAPBody-tp5722638p5722719.html
>> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Glen Mazza
> Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com
> blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Mime
View raw message