Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
Subject: Re: Lowering the memory footprint on deployment of service endpoints
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1346962343348-5713684.post@n5.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:53:04 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <148599D0-203B-4CD7-974F-5F8BED6006B3@apache.org>
References: <1346962343348-5713684.post@n5.nabble.com>
To: users@cxf.apache.org


On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:12 PM, kongar <akong@5amsolutions.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>=20
> I am working with several service endpoints with wsdls that all import =
the
> same huge schemas (HL7) that seems to choke my application server =
whenever I
> try to deploy them.

Are you trying to deploy them as separate wars or all in a single war?

If in separate wars, you may likely be better off if you can move the =
CXF jars and the "shared" classes generated from the schemas out of the =
wars and into something like a "shared/lib" or similar.  If you do that, =
it's likely that CXF can share the JAXBContext objects which can save a =
significant amount of memory.

Dan


>  I am publishing my endpoints via the cxf-servlet.xml
> config file.  Would using a Spring application context or the CXF API =
to
> publish provide me any substantial benefit?  Supposedly the former =
loads
> modules that I may not need, but the latter two are not as well =
documented,
> and consequently, I am having a harder time trying to get those to =
work. =20
> My deployment seems to choke on the WSDLServiceBuilder/JAXBDataBinding
> phase, so I'm guessing the benefits of not using cxf-servlet.xml will =
not
> matter.
>=20
> Can anyone shed some light on what CXF is doing during deployment =
(i.e.
> WSDLServiceBuilder)?  Maybe if I understand what is going on, I can =
tune and
> lower the memory footprint.  Any help will be greatly appreciated!
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> View this message in context: =
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Lowering-the-memory-footprint-on-deploymen=
t-of-service-endpoints-tp5713684.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--=20
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com