cxf-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: UnmarshalException instead of SchemaValidationException
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:25:57 GMT
One more thing, after seeing a response from Dan in the other thread,

Unmarshaller.Listener can also be registered with the provider, not sure 
it can help in your case, but mentioning it just in case

Sergey
On 20/09/12 16:06, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> On 20/09/12 15:48, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> On 20/09/12 15:39, Voß, Marko wrote:
>>>> I guess I'm not understanding the problem well. You said earlier:
>>>
>>>>>> In a negative test, I send some XML to this service, which is wrong
>>>>>> XML for type A. Let's say the XML is of type B. The XML passes the
>>>>>> schema validation, because of it is valid for type B".
>>>
>>>> AFAIK, at the schema validation level, all JAXB does is ensures the
>>>> incoming XML is valid according to the schema, which it is according
>>>> to what you said earlier on.
>>>
>>> In the old code of this service, the service validated the incoming
>>> XML against the schema of the expected type.
>>> In the example, the XML got validated against the schema of type A, no
>>> matter what XML was incoming. I expected the same behavior with CXF,
>>> since I define the expected type in the signature.
>>>
>>>> Unmarshalling is at the next stage, so if the previous stage let 'B'
>>>> to come in then obviously the unmarshaller expecting it to be 'A'
>>>> throws UnmarshallException. I do not see how to make
>>>> SchemaValidationException thrown if the schema validation phase
>>>> passes...
>>>
>>> I meant, that the schema validation phase should not pass, because the
>>> wrong schema is being used right now.
>>
>> Well, you have a schema document which is registered with the JAXB
>> provider so this is what is used to validate the incoming XML.
>>
>>
>>> It should use the schema of the type defined in the signature and not
>>> the schema, which fits to the incoming XML.
>>
>> Is it possible in JAXB to configure Unmrashaller such that it validates
>> the incoming XML based on the information it obtains while populating A,
>> some kind of Java-based in validation ?
>>
>> If yes we can do that
>
> In fact this can probably be enforced at the custom XMLStreamReader level.
> What about this:
> - register custom RequestHandler filter
> - at that level we know the matching Method
> - know, register the basic XMLStreamReader on the current message
> (extending the CXF helper reader), initialized with the info obtained
> from the Method or say from XmlType annotation on the relevant class).
> If the root XML name is not matching the expectations - throw the schema
> validation exception...
>
> Not sure if it is something that will do in your case, but technically
> it can be easily done, can provide more info if needed...
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
>
>>
>> Cheers, Sergey
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:21 PM
>>> To: Voß, Marko
>>> Cc: users@cxf.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: UnmarshalException instead of SchemaValidationException
>>>
>>> On 20/09/12 14:08, Voß, Marko wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>> I guess if a schema is open enough to accept either A or B
>>>>> representations, then there's no bug.
>>>>
>>>> That is not the case here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess I'm not understanding the problem well. You said earlier:
>>>
>>> >> In a negative test, I send some XML to this service, which is wrong
>>> XML for type A. Let's say the XML is of type B. The XML passes the
>>> schema validation, because of it is valid for type B".
>>>
>>> AFAIK, at the schema validation level, all JAXB does is ensures the
>>> incoming XML is valid according to the schema, which it is according
>>> to what you said earlier on.
>>>
>>> Unmarshalling is at the next stage, so if the previous stage let 'B'
>>> to come in then obviously the unmarshaller expecting it to be 'A'
>>> throws UnmarshallException. I do not see how to make
>>> SchemaValidationException thrown if the schema validation phase
>>> passes...
>>>
>>>>> I can see that Unmarshaller can also accept ValidationEventHandler
>>>>> ("validationHandler" provider property). Not sure if it can help -
>>>>> may be you can restrict it there somehow.
>>>>
>>>> Well, we are using the schema validation setup this way already:
>>>>
>>>> <bean name"myJaxbProvider" class="...">
>>>> <property name="catalogLocation" value="..."/>
>>>> <property name="schemaLocations" value="...">
>>>> <list>
>>>> <value>classpath:/xsd/foo.xsd</value>
>>>> ...
>>>> </list>
>>>> </property>
>>>> </bean>
>>>>
>>>> So we have to setup the validation twice or remove this kind of
>>>> validation, we have been talking about lately, and use the
>>>> validationHandler instead?
>>>>
>>> I think ValidationEventHandler is there to complement the validation
>>> set up, for the handler to get more info about the validation process
>>>
>>>>> May my using JAXBElement<A> instead of A is more restrictive, can
>>>>> you try it ?
>>>>
>>>> Tested this with no difference in the result.
>>>>
>>> OK...
>>>
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 2:27 PM
>>>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>>>> Cc: Voß, Marko
>>>> Subject: Re: UnmarshalException instead of SchemaValidationException
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> On 20/09/12 13:02, Voß, Marko wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Say, we have a JAX-RS method like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> @PUT
>>>>> @Path("/foo")
>>>>> @Produces(MediaType.TEXT_XML)
>>>>> @Consumes(MediaType.TEXT_XML)
>>>>> public static A create(A a);
>>>>>
>>>>> In a negative test, I send some XML to this service, which is wrong
>>>>> XML for type A. Let's say the XML is of type B. The XML passes the
>>>>> schema validation, because of it is valid for type B but this method
>>>>> expects type A and so we get a UnmarshalException instead of the
>>>>> SchemaValidationException complaining about the wrong element found.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it a bug, that the schema validation is not using the schema for
>>>>> type A? It looks like it is using the schema, which is responsible
>>>>> for the root element of the passed XML if found.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess if a schema is open enough to accept either A or B
>>>> representations, then there's no bug.
>>>>
>>>> I can see that Unmarshaller can also accept ValidationEventHandler
>>>> ("validationHandler" provider property). Not sure if it can help -
>>>> may be you can restrict it there somehow.
>>>>
>>>> May my using JAXBElement<A> instead of A is more restrictive, can you
>>>> try it ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>>
>>>>> best,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für
>>>>> wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH.
>>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht
>>>>> Mannheim HRB 101892.
>>>>> Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
>>>>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für
>>>> wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH.
>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim
>>>> HRB 101892.
>>>> Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
>>>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für
>>> wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH.
>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim
>>> HRB 101892.
>>> Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
>>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
>>>
>>>
>
>



Mime
View raw message