Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F72E5D4.5010906@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:20:04 +0100
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: CXF Test client for JAXB load testing
References: <1332850152984-5597650.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4F722B79.9040409@gmail.com>
 <CAFhuAmnAaXBikT0n25vPcwBc=54-OCS9r0JstvDVD+aRZbd+VA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFhuAmnAaXBikT0n25vPcwBc=54-OCS9r0JstvDVD+aRZbd+VA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Kiren
On 28/03/12 10:33, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> Hi Sergey!
>
> With your code I'm getting 13 ms average on my Tomcat server and  34ms on
> Jetty maven plugin (I was actually expecting the opposite).
>
> Against the String response url I'm getting 4ms on Tomcat  and 5ms on Jetty.
>
> I think now we're getting down to the level of differences in the quality
> of our hardware, I've got an intel I5  (M 430  @ 2.27GHz) laptop with
> plenty of RAM, you probably have a better machine. I'm running Java 7
> update 3 on a linux 64bit Ubuntu 11.10  machine.
>
I have I7 with few processors and plenty of memory, so that can explain 
some difference. Java6 & Ubuntu 11.04. Please try CXF 2.5.3-SNAPSHOT, 
that might help with saving few milliseconds too plus in case of JAXB - 
save on the pretty-printing 'expenses' which you already verified.

What I think is that the server runtime is performing pretty well, the 
client runtimes have different qualities though and that can affect the 
performance measurements...

Wonder how would JIXB perform :-)

Cheers, Sergey

> Regards
> Kiren
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Kiren
>>
>> On 27/03/12 13:09, Kiren Pillay wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>
>>> Attached is a war file against which I am testing my client.
>>>
>> great, thanks
>>
>>
>>   The test URLS
>>> are given below together with the Jamon stats for a 1000 hits.
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Large response (27k)
>>>
>>> url="http://localhost:8080/**RestTest/rest/test/long/27000<http://localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/test/long/27000>
>>> "**;
>>> JAMon Label=myCodeTimer, Units=ms.: (Hits=1000.0, Avg=7.77, Total=7770.0,
>>> Min=4.0
>>> tps:128.5512276642242
>>>
>>> 2. Small response
>>>
>>> url="http://localhost:8080/**RestTest/rest/test/short<http://localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/test/short>
>>> ";
>>> JAMon Label=myCodeTimer, Units=ms.: (Hits=1000.0, Avg=5.454, Total=5454.0,
>>> Min=3.0, Max=37.0
>>> tps:183.0831197363603
>>>
>>> 3. Dummy Response using the JAXB schema
>>>
>>> url="http://localhost:8080/**RestTest/rest/test/xml<http://localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/test/xml>
>>> ";
>>> JAMon Label=myCodeTimer, Units=ms.: (Hits=1000.0, Avg=15.381,
>>> Total=15381.0,
>>> Min=9.0, Max=542.0,
>>> tps:64.96037417175522
>>>
>>>
>> With the following code:
>>
>> WebClient wc = WebClient.create("http://**localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/**
>> test/xml<http://localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/test/xml>");
>>         wc.accept("text/xml");
>>         // warm up a bit
>>         for (int i = 0; i<  50; i++) {
>>             wc.get();
>>         }
>>
>>         long total = 0;
>>         for (int i = 0; i<  1000; i++) {
>>             long l1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
>>                 wc.get(Document.class);
>>             long l2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
>>
>>                 total += l2-l1;
>>         }
>>         System.out.println("Average: " + total/1000);
>>
>> I'm getting 10 millisecs average. Note I'm adding a Document reading just
>> to eliminate any optimizations with webClient.get() where no actual read is
>> done.
>>
>> Running the same code against
>> http://localhost:8080/**RestTest/rest/test/long/27000<http://localhost:8080/RestTest/rest/test/long/27000>
>>
>> (changing address, accept to text/plain, and wc.get(Document.class); to
>> wc.get(String.class);)
>>
>> gives me 2 milliseconds average.
>>
>>
>> Can you try the same code please ?
>>
>> Cheers, Sergey
>>
>>
>>   I've include our custom JAXB-enabled schema jar, the rest you can build
>>> from
>>> maven pom.xml.
>>>
>>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.**com/file/n5597650/**RestWarProject.tar.gz<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/file/n5597650/RestWarProject.tar.gz>
>>> RestWarProject.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Custom JAXB schema file:
>>>
>>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.**com/file/n5597650/pams-core-**
>>> xsd-server-1.3.0_ba_nemo-**SNAPSHOT.jar<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/file/n5597650/pams-core-xsd-server-1.3.0_ba_nemo-SNAPSHOT.jar>
>>> pams-core-xsd-server-1.3.0_ba_**nemo-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Kiren
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.**
>>> com/CXF-Test-client-for-JAXB-**load-testing-**tp5597650p5597650.html<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-Test-client-for-JAXB-load-testing-tp5597650p5597650.html>
>>> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Beryozkin
>>
>> Talend Community Coders
>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>
>> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
>>
>