Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of evangelinamrm@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2069439.yJp5uYsi3u@dilbert.dankulp.com>
References: <1321040561610-4985366.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<2069439.yJp5uYsi3u@dilbert.dankulp.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:44:21 -0300
Message-ID: 
 <CAOVCkojucee9=sY7Dgk2u77jHUqsxnnSHfyQY1U=QCusmhukXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Alternatives to WSDLQueryHandler?
From: Evangelina Martinez <evangelinamrm@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
Cc: users@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdffc102397b504b1da4da8

--000e0cdffc102397b504b1da4da8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> Doesn't look like it's possible.   Can I ask what you're trying to
achieve?

I'm migrating the functionality that I had in 2.3.1, where if the request
path contains ?wsdl or ?xsd, I would return the corresponding wsdl or xsd.
And for that end I was using the WSDLQueryHandler.

> One option really could be to copy the WSDLQueryHandler from 2.4.x,
modify it
all you want, and register it with 2.5.x.    If there is a query handler
registered, it wouldn't get into the interceptor chain.

Sounds like a good option

Thanks!


On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

> On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:42:41 AM Evangelina wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm upgrading CXF from the version 2.3.1 to 2.5, and I found that that
> > WSDLQueryHandler is not present anymore. I was using the Query handler to
> > generate the WSDL or the XSD.
> >
> > I was trying to use the WSDLGetInterceptor instead, and the
> handleMessage of
> > the interceptor successfully writes the wsdl in the outMessage of the
> > exchange. But then the interceptor has a finally catch that overrides it
> > and sets it to null. So I'm probably missing something, but where is that
> > value persisted?
>
> Doesn't look like it is.
>
> > Is there a way to retrieve it afterwards?
>
> Doesn't look like it's possible.   Can I ask what you're trying to achieve?
>
> One option really could be to copy the WSDLQueryHandler from 2.4.x, modify
> it
> all you want, and register it with 2.5.x.    If there is a query handler
> registered, it wouldn't get into the interceptor chain.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

--000e0cdffc102397b504b1da4da8--