cxf-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <>
Subject Re: Attachments and URIs and REST
Date Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:22:34 GMT
No, I haven't tried it at all yet. I'm really asking if this is considered a
common or reasonable practice. The idea here being that an input parameter
to a service function might be a URI, and then it would work seamlessly in
the attachment case by using a cid: uri. I haven't even looked into what CXF
API I would call, if any, that might help me find the right attachment, or
whether I'd code my own loop over the parts.

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <>wrote:

> Do you see any problems with "cid:" links ?
> Cheers, Sergey
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Benson Margulies <>
> wrote:
> > Has anyone ever seen the use of 'cid:' uris sent in JSON packages of a
> > service to refer to data in an attachment?
> >

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message