Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of robert2417@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority
         :importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole;
        b=hOkswHnHnhr3f4RMB/FFh3F6XSQVb+3m0uZVzZuS51JEnbriTXiptA7cZc2w9Ds89+
         SZdbrpC0LKil2CSR1h8bGPr0+AYu8Dd3/POcqgpoLZf3vgs7cWr9w6av9y3vO7FyufP/
         h9H7apgh/3oyXaFPcfRAns3pirXCBsCnpcV10=
Message-ID: <A07A80DA63F14EB3820D7208847C4FED@RockfishReports>
From: "Robert Liguori" <robert2417@gmail.com>
To: <users@cxf.apache.org>
References: 
 <F184150B4E113C40BDB1EDBA812C74C4177684B3EB@EMAIL1.sinclairoil.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <F184150B4E113C40BDB1EDBA812C74C4177684B3EB@EMAIL1.sinclairoil.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with CXF site
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:52:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal


"XJC Utils" and "Build Utils" appear to be empty place holders... guess 
someone is planning on doing something with these web pages?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ron Grimes" <rgrimes@sinclairoil.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:50 PM
To: <users@cxf.apache.org>
Subject: Problem with CXF site

> Sorry for posting a web site usability issue here. But, not sure where is 
> the proper place.
>
> So, what's up with accessing the XJC Utils link on cxf.apache.org? I click 
> on it, and makes me register. Did that, logged in, and when I click on XJC 
> Utils, it tells me I don't have permission. Give me a break! What's so 
> special about this link that I can't access it? I'm trying to figure out 
> what the new *-xjc-* jars are for in the new 2.3 version, which is why I 
> wanted in there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron Grimes
>
>