Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.44.156 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=gvea6asUmXdmiewA177CUKGvOq7cRcg6O3RHcZXnOHFoJWtuB4sZ14GNBtyWyxD3gB
         KAo0aPb+CWhUfcxK6HaOXGg6qJGYO5aJMj0uV5fXswS3ape78Hso6imRBXAHDjWpqU3O
         Fs/AlLvhtZfD0QfmVKuqKtkUr7uvn3XP+Hq8E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22028908.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: 
 <2B674CE447106D46A53D0FDDC7DF8B1C027E91DA@PTXSMSXM01.emea.ime.reuters.com>
	 <61b5d9410810100500x61e7238ds56808c437c59ca7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <22022406.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <61b5d9410902150532j2559caddn7d1897932ff915a9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <22022881.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <61b5d9410902150631v780b8690x7074c3f485608967@mail.gmail.com>
	 <61b5d9410902151326y4a6fa8a1g67251ef58675d5b3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <22028908.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:05:22 -0500
Message-ID: <61b5d9410902151505t7e721a76u72e853757296c9c4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CXF doesn't respect annotations
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think that if you read any of the stock tutorials on JAXB, you'll
see that this is made pretty clear.  They explain that JAXB infers
elements from fields or from get/setters, as controlled by the
annotations on the class. By default, those annotations do not examine
anything private.

Look at the J2SE 6.0 javadoc for XmlAccessorType to see what I'm talking about.

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:59 PM, kariem@sf <kariem@users.sf.net> wrote:
>
>
> bimargulies wrote:
> >
> > This is a bug in the Jaxb RI 2.1.9.
> >
>
> Fast and very good response, Beson. Thank you very much. Everything working
> now, thanks to your suggestion on the issue: putting the annotation on the
> setter method for the property made it work. I have updated the JIRA issue
> with a working test case.
>
> The problem is resolved, but I still have a bad feeling. Do you recommend
> filing a bug with JAXB (it should work on class field level)? Should we add
> something to the documentation for CXF? Or do you think the JIRA issue and
> the comments on this list are enough?
>
> Cheers,
> Kariem
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-doesn%27t-respect-annotations-tp19894613p22028908.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>