Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17503 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2009 14:06:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2009 14:06:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 74944 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 14:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 74555 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 14:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 74544 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2009 14:06:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:06:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:06:15 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LMNQQ-0003JU-P9 for users@cxf.apache.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:05:54 -0800 Message-ID: <21415077.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:05:54 -0800 (PST) From: esschul To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: Versioning java2ws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: espen@udp.no X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi hi, we have an implementation where we haven't done it the contract-first way, but only annotated the java code. Our wsdl is created based on our java code implementation.. I feel it's time to get more control over the interface versions, and would like to control our wsdl by versioning. If we change the java code in any way that changes the wsdl, then the version number on the wsdl/namespace should be altered. Any good advice, guys/gals, to how I should proceed? Any code examples aswell would be greatly appreciated. -Espen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Versioning-java2ws-tp21415077p21415077.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.