Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80615 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2008 04:10:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2008 04:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 32555 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 04:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-users-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 32511 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 04:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 32500 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2008 04:10:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:10:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:09:22 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KddVB-0006yA-JU for users@cxf.apache.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:09:53 -0700 Message-ID: <19427496.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:09:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Glen Mazza To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: First WSDL-to-Java client issues In-Reply-To: <48C836EA.3030305@johndubchak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: glen.mazza@gmail.com References: <48C7F434.8070403@johndubchak.com> <19421932.post@talk.nabble.com> <48C836EA.3030305@johndubchak.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org John-567 wrote: > > I'm definitely leaning toward Maven but the environment I am working in > uses > Ant most often and this development approach is new to them, so I'm not > sure I would be successful introducing an additional technology such as > Maven to them. > You can do what I did--start with Ant then move on to Maven once the web service stuff becomes old hat. I've always liked Ant but learned Maven last year because most others I saw in the Open Source community were happy with it. It took a while to get used to Maven but I'm glad I learned it. John-567 wrote: > > ...perhaps I should just force feed it to them. ;-) > Well, be careful, depending on your team, you might be opening yourself up to "workplace mobbing" if you don't get sufficient buy-in from the team first. If you do go this route, use a small spoon and interrupt the process frequently with cookies... ;-) Glen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/First-WSDL-to-Java-client-issues-tp19417535p19427496.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.