Mailing-List: contact cxf-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <13666392.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 04:49:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Adrian C <adrian.corcoran@gmail.com>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: schema validation
In-Reply-To: <200711081714.31412.dkulp@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <13646130.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <200711081713.18161.dkulp@apache.org> <200711081714.31412.dkulp@apache.org>


Hi Dan,

Thanks for your help as always - looks like upgrading to 2.0.3 & upgrading
XMLSchema resolved this issue. The only issue I have with this now is with
xsd:restriction - they are not annotated, not supported, so am forced to
reference the wsdl, not big deal, this works

I am however still having problems with the schema validation & mtom.

Its faily obvious why its breaking, however I would thought that there could
be some iffing about butting around the mtom (attachement in/out
interceptor).. i.e. before mtom'ing perform schema validation if enabled,
and them remove mark as being validated...

Or is it designed to work this way? 


dkulp wrote:
> 
> 
> Forgot to mention, 2.0.3 is being voted on now.   You can download the 
> release candidate from:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.3-incubator-take1/dist/
> 
> (That may fix your mtom validation issue as well, not really sure though)
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Thursday 08 November 2007, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 November 2007, Adrian C wrote:
>> > With jaxb if schema validation is turned on should validation work
>> > if the wsld is not defined for the webservice? Am seeing errors when
>> > I do this - I though that the schema/wsld could be generated from
>> > the classes?
>>
>> In theory, it should.   I'm not sure how well tested it is though.
>>
>> I'd love to see any test cases if there is an issue.   Also,
>> definitely try with 2.0.3.    We upgraded to a newer version of
>> XmlSchema to fix SOME issues where the schema was losing some needed
>> information.  (such as whether a base64 thing was mtom enabled or
>> not).   Thus, 2.0.3 may fix some of the isssues.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/schema-validation-tf4770643.html#a13666392
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.