Mailing-List: contact cxf-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 bim2007@basistech.com does not designate 199.88.205.99 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: JSR 181 & Document literal wrapped
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:42:40 -0400
Message-ID: <E95FD77F0171D14DA1EEE0A785E92B430234C0D7@mail3.basistech.net>
In-Reply-To: <13212227.post@talk.nabble.com>
Thread-Topic: JSR 181 & Document literal wrapped
Thread-Index: AcgPK7Cy+qwyE10/Q8qz0qUOwzahzAADdkcw
References: <13212227.post@talk.nabble.com>
From: "Benson Margulies" <bim2007@basistech.com>
To: <cxf-user@incubator.apache.org>

Where are you getting the requirement that the response be named
'Response', as opposed to, say, OpNameResponse?

Aside from that, I think that what you are asking for is the default
behavior of JAX-WS + JAXB.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cunparis [mailto:michaelpub@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:02 AM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: JSR 181 & Document literal wrapped
>=20
>=20
> I'd like to use JSR 181 to expose a class as a web service using
document
> literal wrapped encoding.  In DLW each operation must have one
parameter
> with the same name as the operation, and the return object has the
same
> name
> + Response.  I'm curious if I have to follow these standards in Java
when
> I
> design the interfaces or if I can just make normal java methods and
have
> JSR
> 181 generate the service DLW?
>=20
> Anyone tried this?
>=20
>=20
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JSR-181---Document-
> literal-wrapped-tf4627235.html#a13212227
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.