cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CXF-6986) Don't require an application class if using CDI
Date Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:14:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15590321#comment-15590321
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-6986:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user johnament opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182

    [CXF-6986] If no application classes found, install a default application

    Some minor clean ups like make sure on the latest weld version.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/johnament/cxf CXF-6986

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #182
    
----
commit e8c6c6a8ddbc2c2d5142c5f85728cc4358342ddb
Author: John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
Date:   2016-08-03T00:34:08Z

    [CXF-6986] If no application classes found, install a default application.

----


> Don't require an application class if using CDI
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6986
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.6
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
>
> The current CXF-CDI integration assumes there will be an application class.  It would
be great if CXF did not require an application class, to simplify developer workload.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message