Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1038200B11 for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 17:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A946416099F; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F21AA160A07 for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 17:51:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 50648 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2016 15:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 50487 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2016 15:51:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:51:13 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3B2C1F68 for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:51:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" To: issues@cxf.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (CXF-6869) Consider adding Spring Boot starter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:51:14 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15305959#comment-15305959 ] Sergey Beryozkin edited comment on CXF-6869 at 5/29/16 3:51 PM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Vedran, that was not a complexity by design, all I wanted is for users to easily switch between the two options, who knew SpringBoot would get confused, it is asked to load a given SpringBoot application, why does it load another one, seems like an obvious bug to me. All this Spring 'simplicity', it evaporates as soon as one starts practically experimenting with it, sorry for being a bit grumpy :-). was (Author: sergey_beryozkin): Hi Vedran, that was not a complexity by design, all I wanted is for users to easily switch between the two options, who knew SpringBoot would get confused, it is asked to load a given SpringBoot application, why does it load another one, seems like an obvious bug to me. All this Spring 'simplicity', it is evaporates as soon as one starts practically experimenting with it, sorry for being a bit grumpy :-). > Consider adding Spring Boot starter > ----------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-6869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Integration > Reporter: Vedran Pavic > Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin > > I've recently authored a PR in Spring Boot to add support for auto-configuration of {{CXFServlet}} and default CXF's configuration: > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/5659 > The PR was closed with "won't fix" resolution since Boot team are unwilling to add CXF as a dependency to the project. Instead a 3rd party starter was suggested. > The concept of a 3rd party starter is generally encouraged for technologies that don't have first-class support in projects from Spring portfolio. Such 3rd party starters are listed here: > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-starters/README.adoc > If CXF team is interested, I'm willing to port my PR to CXF. > Note that the original PR was focused around JAX-WS support, but can be easily expanded to include JAX-RS support as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)