cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CXF-6515) provider sorting not right
Date Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:54:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14680663#comment-14680663
] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-6515:
---------------------------------------

Hi Romain - the bus related update goes in the next day or two.
Let me clarify once again. I argued a lot about: 1) if the custom provider matches then do
not even check the default ones 2) more recently - if a default provider had a non-wildcard
@Produces then it does not mean another provider with a wildcard is less specific because
it can check a media type in isWriteable/isReadable, but well, in the end of the day, I had
to this change, I think it is positive in its own way that CXF will now pass some remaining
TCK tests it used to fail otherwise, and the workaround about some situations are possible.
We have a custom provider - I'm still curious why you see some strange results there :-),
please investigate. The bus update will go shortly. The custom providers which extend AbstractConfiurableProvider
can do a very specific Consumes/Produces and the runtime will respect that. Narrowing down
Produces/Consumes is most likely a needed compromise...Overall I reckon we can manage the
situation well...

> provider sorting not right
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6515
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6515
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>             Fix For: 3.1.3, 3.0.7
>
>
> Didnt dig too much into it but seems sorting with a custom comparator is not respected,
can be linked to 6514, if this 6514 is fixed I'll test again to confirm this one



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message