Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863B810CB5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70132 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2015 16:26:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 70098 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2015 16:26:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 70086 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2015 16:26:35 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:26:35 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:26:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" To: issues@cxf.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CXF-6189) Improve memory usage of UrlUtils MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14275484#comment-14275484 ] Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-6189: --------------------------------------- I wonder if we should actually settle on v2. The memory gain is not major, and given that the memory is generally cheap now, the performance gains are more interesting IMHO, v2 is still having a memory gain compared to CXF 3.0.3 and significantly faster. Cheers, Sergey > Improve memory usage of UrlUtils > -------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-6189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6189 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 3.0.3 > Reporter: Lucas Pouzac > Labels: performance > Attachments: jmh.tar.gz, screenshot-1.png > > > When I run load test, I find that the management of encoding parameters of the urls is consumer memory. > I do not know if it is possible to optimize this part. > Throughput of load test : 400 query/s > ~80% GET query with 6 parameters > ~20% POST query with 6 parameters GET and 1 payload -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)