cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CXF-6206) JAASLoginInterceptor: Return proper unauthorized response when JAAS login with basic auth fails
Date Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:40:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14283733#comment-14283733
] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-6206:
---------------------------------------

JAASAutheniticationFilter is a standard JAX-RS 2.0 ContainerRequestFilter and hence it is
not going to be removed.  Not sure what you mean by the standard interceptors.
JAASAutheniticationFilter and doAs just does not work due to some JAX-RS runtime implementation
restrictions, but to be honest, IMHO I do not see it as a major issue. I'm open though to
updating the filter to actually getting working woith doAs.

I do not think JAASLoginInterceptor need to become any more complex than it already is.


> JAASLoginInterceptor: Return proper unauthorized response when JAAS login with basic
auth fails
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6206
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6206
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core, Transports
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Christian Schneider
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> Currently we return a Fault with a AuthenticationException when JAAS login fails.
> The proper response would be a 401 status with a suitable WWW-Authenticate header.
> I experimented with turning the AuthenticationException into a 401 response in the http
transport. Not sure where to take auth type and realm from though. I am also not sure how
to distinguish basic auth from WSS Security UsernameToken. As in the second case 401 is probably
not correct.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message