Return-Path: 
 <issues-return-28702-apmail-cxf-issues-archive=cxf.apache.org@cxf.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE883105C7
	for <apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:21:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 42584 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2014 21:21:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42324 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2014 21:21:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:issues-help@cxf.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:issues-unsubscribe@cxf.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:issues@cxf.apache.org>
List-Id: <issues.cxf.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42204 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2014 21:21:38 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:21:38 +0000
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@cxf.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12691449.1390851692562.21309.1390857698153@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12691449.1390851692562@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12691449.1390851692562@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CXF-5528) CXF Blueprint resource classes should
 have a more simple definition
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13883324#comment-13883324 ] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-5528:
---------------------------------------

Hi, thanks for a patch. Right now I'm not sure we really need to have a dedicated extension specifically for managing resource class names.
Note, you can do

{code:xml}
<jaxrs:serviceBeans>
<bean class="com.example.test.cxf.StringRestServiceImpl"/>
</jaxrs:serviceBeans>
{code}

That should work for you, right ?
Also, a patch for getting classes auto-discovered under Blueprint is also available, I haven't had a chance yet to work with it...

Cheers, Sergey

> CXF Blueprint resource classes should have a more simple definition
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5528
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.8
>            Reporter: Heath Kesler
>         Attachments: SimpleJAXRSTest.zip, cxf-5528-patch.diff
>
>
> When defining serviceBeans in the blueprint xml file, we first have to define the bean then reference that bean from the serviceBean definition.  It would be nice to have a short cut that allowed us to just define the class name in the rsServer xml.  Something like 
>     <jaxrs:server id="karafStringService" address="/karaf">
>         <jaxrs:resourceClasses>
>             <class name="com.example.test.cxf.StringRestServiceImpl"/>
>         </jaxrs:resourceClasses>
>     </jaxrs:server>
> I will be submitting a patch shortly with an associated test.  I look forward to feedback.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)