cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Heath Kesler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CXF-5528) CXF Blueprint resource classes should have a more simple definition
Date Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:27:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13884244#comment-13884244
] 

Heath Kesler commented on CXF-5528:
-----------------------------------

Hi Sergey,

Yeah, I think the point is to allow the interface to define the endpoint and be deployed that
way, then allow the runtime to find the implementing resource... just like you stated.  Can
you point me at the ticket for the auto-discovery?

Cheers
Heath

> CXF Blueprint resource classes should have a more simple definition
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5528
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.8
>            Reporter: Heath Kesler
>         Attachments: SimpleJAXRSTest.zip, cxf-5528-patch.diff
>
>
> When defining serviceBeans in the blueprint xml file, we first have to define the bean
then reference that bean from the serviceBean definition.  It would be nice to have a short
cut that allowed us to just define the class name in the rsServer xml.  Something like 
>     <jaxrs:server id="karafStringService" address="/karaf">
>         <jaxrs:resourceClasses>
>             <class name="com.example.test.cxf.StringRestServiceImpl"/>
>         </jaxrs:resourceClasses>
>     </jaxrs:server>
> I will be submitting a patch shortly with an associated test.  I look forward to feedback.
 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message