Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@cxf.apache.org
Message-ID: <685741754.52532.1351711331717.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <1859290370.10587.1338290664445.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CXF-4348) Content-Type is broken in multipart
 serialization
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13488127#comment-13488127 ] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-4348:
---------------------------------------

FYI:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1404308&view=rev
                
> Content-Type is broken in multipart serialization
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-4348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4348
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Ivan Bondarenko
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: bug, multipart, serialization
>             Fix For: 2.5.5, 2.6.2, 2.7.0
>
>
> Multiparts are serialized incorrectly.
> Imagine the response with two attachments:
> a) "filename1.doc" with attachment-id "Attachment_id1" and Content-Type "application/msword"
> b) "filename2.xls" with attachment-id "Attachment_id2" and Content-Type "application/vnd.ms-excel"
> Serialization of this Multipart is ({} are used for text reduction):
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Server: ...
> Date: ...
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; type="application/msword"; boundary="uuid:{UUID}"; start="<Attachment_id1>"; start-info="application/msword"
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> --uuid:{UUID}
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8; type="application/msword";
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> Content-ID: <Attachment_id1>
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename1.doc
> {CONTENT1}
> --uuid:{UUID}
> Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> Content-ID: <Attachment_id2>
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename2.xls
> {CONTENT2}
> --uuid:{UUID}--
> While we are expecting kind of this:
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Server: ...
> Date: ...
> Content-Type: multipart/related
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> --uuid:{UUID}
> Content-Type: application/msword;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> Content-ID: <Attachment_id1>
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename1.doc
> {CONTENT1}
> --uuid:{UUID}
> Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> Content-ID: <Attachment_id2>
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename2.xls
> {CONTENT2}
> --uuid:{UUID}--
> So the Content-Type of the whole response and of the first part are incorrect.
> The starting point of the bug searching is org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.ext.MessageContextImpl.convertToAttachments(Object) method, which has at least these sub-bugs:
> 1) First attachment is handled other way than all subsequent ones -> All attachments must be handled in the same way.
> 2) AttachmentOutputInterceptor is created with some default Contetnt-Type, which is "application/octet-stream" -> The type must be "multipart/related" (or other multipart).
> 3) Content-Type of outMessage is changed to the first attachment's Content-Type and then new type is used at least in org.apache.cxf.attachment.AttachmentSerializer.writeProlog() method -> The same type must be used.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira