cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoan-Vu Phan (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CXF-4477) [WADL2JAVA] Generate incorrect primitive parameter type
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:03:38 GMT


Hoan-Vu Phan commented on CXF-4477:

It's clear to me, and it's really nice Sergey :)
I think, we don't need to have a mapping between schema types and java classes because it
is jaxb bindings work.
We just need a mapping between primitive types for the interface generating.

Now, I work perfectly :)

Thanks for your commitment.
Best regards.

> [WADL2JAVA] Generate incorrect primitive parameter type 
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-4477
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS, Tooling
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Hoan-Vu Phan
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>            Priority: Critical
> In we have the code like this:
> XSD_SPECIFIC_TYPE_MAP = new HashMap<String, String>();
> XSD_SPECIFIC_TYPE_MAP.put("string", "String");
> XSD_SPECIFIC_TYPE_MAP.put("decimal", "java.math.BigInteger");
> XSD_SPECIFIC_TYPE_MAP.put("integer", "long");
> If we have a wadl like this:
> <param name="param1" required="true" style="query" type="xs:int" />
> <param name="param2" required="true" style="query" type="xs:long" />
> it's always generate (String param1) and (String param2)
> So far as I know, xs:int and xs:long beside xs:string are the most usage type in WADL.
But now it can not work any more!!!!
> I think this is a regression bug from
> **********************************************************
> sergeyb  08.05.12 19:25:44
> [CXF-4292] Defaulting to String when WADL Generator can not determine a class name of
the primitive type
> **********************************************************
> For the solution, I think we can expand XSD_SPECIFIC_TYPE_MAP which the exactly mapping
as a standard:
> Could you please have a look on this issue.
> Many many many thanks :)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message