Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37146992B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90217 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2012 14:48:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 90132 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2012 14:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 90124 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2012 14:48:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:48:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:48:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E1B134D40 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:48:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daniel Kulp (Commented) (JIRA)" To: issues@cxf.apache.org Message-ID: <762552537.119.1327675691341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <664265237.46.1327674975146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CXF-4071) LoggingInterceptors contain parts which are not nessecary. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4071?page=3Dcom.atlassian.j= ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D131948= 04#comment-13194804 ]=20 Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-4071: ---------------------------------- These interceptors are also used on the Client side. On the client side, = on the incoming message, knowing the response code is important as that can= help diagnose what the chains are doing, what the REST server did, etc....= On outgoing, the METHOD is important, especially for REST where the MET= HOD is an extremely important part about what the request is doing. I would not remove them. However, it could be put into a MessageUtils.isR= equestor(...) block. =20 > LoggingInterceptors contain parts which are not nessecary. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-4071 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4071 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.5.2 > Reporter: Michael Prie=C3=9F > Assignee: Christian Schneider > Attachments: LoggingInInterceptor.java.patch, LoggingOutIntercept= or.java.patch > > Original Estimate: 5m > Remaining Estimate: 5m > > The LoggingInInterceptor trying to log the Message.RESPONSE_CODE, this is= not necessary. > The LoggingOutInterceptor trying to log the HTTP_REQUEST_METHOD, this is = not necessary. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jsp= a For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira