cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-3235) Introduce a switch for the soap/jms spec transport to turn of SoapJMSInInterceptor
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:51:50 GMT


Glen Mazza commented on CXF-3235:

Devil's advocate: Since this code is apparently new can't we hold off on adding the switch
and instead put JIRAs in for other implementations to become compliant with the spec?  The
problem with adding this flag is that once it's in there, it will always be in there (with
whatever subsequent security or accuracy risks inherent in shutting off these faults), and
I'm not sure that CXF should worry about obsolete implementations that cannot send the required
JMS properties.  (Here I define "obsolete" as not an implementation that presently does not
support the JMS properties but is so inactive that JIRAs to that particular project would
*not* result in the problem being fixed.)

What are the primary nonsupporting implementations you're concerned about right now that causes
you to want to add this flag?


> Introduce a switch for the soap/jms spec transport to turn of SoapJMSInInterceptor
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-3235
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>             Fix For: 2.3.2
> The soap/jms spec requires several jms properties like SOAPJMS_contentType to be set
on an incoming message. In case the required properties are not present a fault is returned.
> While this is perfectly compliant with the spec it creates interop problems with implementations
that do not yet follow the spec.
> So I propose to introduce a switch that disables the SoapJMSInInterceptor or that turns
the faults into warnings. This would allow older clients to interoperate with cxf.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message