cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Kulp (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-2003) Failure in unit test AnnotatedTypeTest.testAegisType
Date Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:51:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667044#action_12667044
] 

Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-2003:
----------------------------------


Definitely a Java 6 thing.   I can reproduce this with 1.6.0_11.   All tests pass with 1.5.0_16.




> Failure in unit test AnnotatedTypeTest.testAegisType
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-2003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2003
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Aegis Databinding
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.3
>         Environment: Windows Vista
> JDK 1.6.0 update 10
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>
> Currently the test AnnotatedTypeTest.testAegisType fails for me with the following log:
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<att[Prop]> but was:<att[ributeProperty]>
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:99)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:117)
> 	at org.apache.cxf.aegis.type.java5.AnnotatedTypeTest.testAegisType(AnnotatedTypeTest.java:112)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:45)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> 	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> When looking at the code of AnnotatedBean3 the attribute seems to be named attributeProperty.
So there is no wonder that the failure happens.
> If I understand this correctly the code of the test should be changed to expect "attributeProperty".
>         assertEquals("attributeProperty", q.getLocalPart());
> What I donĀ“t understand is that this problem does not show in the continuous integration
builds. Or does it show?
> That is why I hesitated to commit the change myself.
> Could someone with access to the continuous integration system check if the failure also
happens there and if it is safe to do the above change.
> I have several other unit test failures that I will report once I understand this issue.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message