cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jon Miller (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-1979) wsdl2java fails to generate working client code if web service name or serviceName is "Service"
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:36:59 GMT


Jon Miller commented on CXF-1979:

On the server side, if I do this:

public class NewWebService {

Then JAX-WS RI does this:

 * This class was generated by the JAX-WS RI.
 * JAX-WS RI 2.1.4-b01-
 * Generated source version: 2.1
@WebServiceClient(name = "NewWebServiceService", targetNamespace = "http://test/", wsdlLocation
= "http://localhost:8084/WebApplication4/NewWebService?wsdl")
public class NewWebServiceService
    extends Service

Interestingly, there is no _ (underscore), but, it does seem to always append a "Service"
at the end. Personally, I'm still a bit confused on what the difference is between the name
and serviceName properties of the WebService annotation. I'm not setting either of those in
this example.

I'm just a lowly staff member here at U of C. ;-) Not sure I could afford the tuition if I
was a student. ;-) Where are you from?

> wsdl2java fails to generate working client code if web service name or serviceName is
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-1979
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tooling
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.3
>         Environment: Windows XP, JDK 1.6.0_11, JAX-WS RI for the web service, and CXF
for the client
>            Reporter: Jon Miller
>            Priority: Minor
> If you create a web service and set the name or serviceName to "Service" like the following,

> @WebService(name = "Service", serviceName = "Service")
> public class Service {
> ...
> }
> and you use wsdl2java to generate client code for the web service. The generated code
won't compile. This is because is imported in some of the files and it
gets confused between this and the generated classes. It would be better if the generated
code fully qualified the class names rather than importing them. Or, if knew to look for conflicts
and renamed the classes to something else. i.e. maybe just call it Service2 instead.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message