Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69708 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2008 15:55:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2008 15:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 37637 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 15:55:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-issues-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 37619 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 15:55:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 37606 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2008 15:55:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:55:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:54:40 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C331234C1E2 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1226721199.1222098884302.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric Sirianni (JIRA)" To: issues@cxf.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (CXF-1809) Annotated @PostConstruct methods called twice on single Spring bean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Annotated @PostConstruct methods called twice on single Spring bean -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CXF-1809 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1809 Project: CXF Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.1.1 Environment: All Reporter: Eric Sirianni Seems like an overlap between CXF's Jsr250BeanPostProcessor and Spring's CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor: First invocation: MyBean.init() line: 41 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 39 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 25 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 585 InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$LifecycleElement.invoke(Object) line: 297 InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$LifecycleMetadata.invokeInitMethods(Object, String) line: 250 CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor(InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor).postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object, String) line: 144 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization(Object, String) line: 350 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).initializeBean(String, Object, RootBeanDefinition) line: 1330 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).doCreateBean(String, RootBeanDefinition, Object[]) line: 473 AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory$1.run() line: 409 Second invocation: MyBean.init() line: 41 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 39 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 25 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 585 ResourceInjector.invokePostConstruct() line: 304 ResourceInjector.construct(Object) line: 86 Jsr250BeanPostProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization(Object, String) line: 58 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(Object, String) line: 361 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).initializeBean(String, Object, RootBeanDefinition) line: 1343 DefaultListableBeanFactory(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory).doCreateBean(String, RootBeanDefinition, Object[]) line: 473 AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory$1.run() line: 409 I noticed this checkin after doing a google search http://code.google.com/p/xebia-france/source/detail?r=139 - it seems relevant to this bug -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.