cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (CXF-1185) Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:03:50 GMT
Should Java REST annotations (JRA) values be incorporated within CXF (instead of codehaus)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: CXF-1185
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1185
             Project: CXF
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: REST
            Reporter: Glen Mazza
            Priority: Minor


Team,  presently our JRA annotations[1] apparently are incorporated from XFire's annotations--see
here[2] and Example #14 here[3].  I'm not sure, but I wonder if we should switch the following
annotations to a CXF package:

import org.codehaus.jra.Delete;
import org.codehaus.jra.Get;
import org.codehaus.jra.HttpResource;
import org.codehaus.jra.Post;
import org.codehaus.jra.Put;

[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/http-binding.html#HTTPBinding-JavaRESTAnnotations
[2] http://tinyurl.com/2ldu5z
[3] http://res.sys-con.com/story/oct07/452355/source.html


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message