cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Kulp (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Assigned: (CXF-1003) WebFaultOutInterceptor.getFaultMessagePart() might be too draconian and it also has private visibility
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:00:55 GMT


Daniel Kulp reassigned CXF-1003:

    Assignee: Daniel Kulp

> WebFaultOutInterceptor.getFaultMessagePart() might be too draconian and it also has private
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-1003
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>         Environment: Platform independent.
>            Reporter: Zarar Siddiqi
>            Assignee: Daniel Kulp
>         Attachments: BetterCheckForAFaultMessagePartInfo.patch
> This implementation of this method is a little draconian (at least to me).  It forces
a match on the localPart and the namespace of MessagePartInfo and the fault QName before returning
the MessagePartInfo.  In the case of where the exception class annotated with @WebFault (default
namespace so it "inherits" the services) is also the fault bean (i.e.: no getFaultInfo method
specified) the name of the namespace URI will never match because only mpi's that are NOT
elements are going to be considered.   And since the fault class is a java class, it's corresponding
MPI's getTypeQName() will always return the namespace corresponding to the package name and
NOT the real namespace of the exception (which really lies behind getElementQName()).
> I propose changing this method so that if no MessagePartInfo is found using the current
method, we loosen the criteria and return a match based on  the elementQName.  This will also
require modification of the MessagePartInfo class.  
> Now the alternate is to make this method public or protected so it can be overridden.
 But that's not really a solution.
> I'm working on a patch but before I upload it I was wondering what the CXF team thought
of this
> Thanks,
> Zarar
> Here's the method up for review:
> private MessagePartInfo getFaultMessagePart(QName qname, OperationInfo op) {
> 	for (FaultInfo faultInfo : op.getFaults()) {
> 		for (MessagePartInfo mpi : faultInfo.getMessageParts()) {
> 			String ns = null;
> 			if (mpi.isElement()) {
> 				ns = mpi.getElementQName().getNamespaceURI();
> 			} else {
> 				ns = mpi.getTypeQName().getNamespaceURI();
> 			}
> 			if (qname.getLocalPart().equals(mpi.getConcreteName().getLocalPart())
> 					&& qname.getNamespaceURI().equals(ns)) {
> 				return mpi;
> 			}
> 		}
> 	}

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message