cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Glen Mazza (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-1144) Issue with .NET clients - stub method parameters wrapped in a parameter class
Date Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:13:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538185
] 

Glen Mazza commented on CXF-1144:
---------------------------------

Well your method signatures would still have to be that way for the *response* elements, which
can only return one data value/object.  (i.e., DoItResponse myDIR = port.someCall(); )  It
would be strange to have the request elements appear in one form but the response elements
be the other.  I wonder if you can use XSLT to modify the WSDL in the manner that you would
like.

Also, as you can see here[1], sometimes a complex type is used for multiple elements, so if
the complex type was embedded within the element as you're requesting, it would need to be
duplicated for each element using that complex type.

[1] http://preview.tinyurl.com/2wybsv


> Issue with .NET clients - stub method parameters wrapped in a parameter class
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1144
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tawfik Lachheb
>
> We are trying to upgrade our published services from xfire to cxf.  We are using the
simple frontend with aegis.  Before we push the upgrade to production, we need to make sure
the upgrade as transparent as possible to our users.  With cxf, we see that the .NET client
stubs are different from the ones users are getting now from xfire.  A method that appears
as doIt(Thing a, Thing b) for example appears as dotIt(DoItRequest request) where DoItRequest
contains the a and b parameters.
> I found out that doing a small change to the wsdl makes .NET generate the stubs the way
we want them.  Changing the method request element from this for example:
>   <xsd:element name="findFeaturesByExtent" type="tns:findFeaturesByExtent" /> 
>   <xsd:complexType name="findFeaturesByExtent">
>   <xsd:sequence>
>   <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="extent" type="tns:Envelope" /> 
>   <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="spatialQueryOptions" type="tns:SpatialQueryOptions"
/> 
>   <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="token" type="xsd:string" /> 
>   </xsd:sequence>
>   </xsd:complexType>
> to this
> <xsd:element name="findFeaturesByExtent">
> <xsd:complexType name="findFeaturesByExtent">
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="extent" type="ns0:Envelope"/>
> <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="spatialQueryOptions" type="ns0:SpatialQueryOptions"/>
> <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="token" type="xsd:string"/>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> </xsd:element>
> fixes the problem.
> Please let me know if you need any additional info.
> Thanks

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message