cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Schneider (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-1125) java_first_jaxws example should use maven and JaxWs*FactoryBean
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:15:50 GMT


Christian Schneider commented on CXF-1125:

The patch can of course wait that long. I have added the pom to the wiki so people have a
starting point for working with maven and cxf.

I already guessed that this is the way JAX WS is defined. But I think using the Service.*
setup gives the novice user absolutely no clue how do to other xfire setups. And the notation
looks very different from the Simple Frontend. But of course follwing the standard also is
a good thing. Perhaps we could show both ways. 

If you tell me what you want changed I can build a new patch.

> java_first_jaxws example should use maven and JaxWs*FactoryBean
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-1125
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Samples
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>         Attachments: cxf_javafrst_path.txt
> When I tried to start with cxf I had the problem that I did not find a good java first
example that was extensible.
> I wanted to start with Java First , JAX-WS and JAXB and build the project with maven.
I wanted an example that I could then
> gradually extend to play with the features of cxf.
> The current example has some shortcommings.
> 1) There is no support for maven. So people using maven will have difficulties setting
all dependencies correctly
> Can be easily fixed by adding a pom.xml
> 2) The way the server and client are set up gives you no clue how to extend the thing
> I would propose using JaxWs*FactoryBean. The developer using the example will be more
familiar with this style.
> 3) You donĀ“t see the incoming and outgoing messages
> I would add logging interceptors
> 4) The example lacks the @webparam annotation so it will not really produce a nice wsdl
> Simple: add the annotation
> I will work out a patch.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message