cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Yu (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-803) Configuring interceptors using annotations
Date Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:06:32 GMT


Jeff Yu commented on CXF-803:

As I looked at Xfire InHandlers and OutHandlers, they are very simple, it just looks up the
annotation on the ServiceBean class. (possiblily I might be wrong here) Here I have some questions:
1. Do we just need to implement it as simple as what Xfire does? say, we just need to look
up the annotation in the ServiceBean class.
2. If we also support this annotation in the SEI, what if both SEI and implementor specify
this annotation, say which one has high priority? what is the correct search order?  In fact,
I think in most of cases, people would like to have this in the implementor instead of SEI.
3. I think for the CXF, we should also support InFaultInterceptor, OutFaultInterceptor annotation.

 Zarar, from the maillist, you said you were writing something similiar stuff, have you started
working on this JIRA, if not, I think I can pick it up..

> Configuring interceptors using annotations
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-803
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Zarar Siddiqi
> It would be helpful to configure interceptors using annotations.  CXF would benefit by
having annotations similar to XFire's org.codehaus.xfire.annotations.InHandlers and org.codehaus.xfire.annotations.OutHandlers
as it would allow specifying specific interceptors for service implementations.
> This issue came up on the mailing list:
> Thanks,
> Zarar

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message