cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bozhong Lin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (CXF-622) HTTPClientPolicy CacheControl type should accept parameters for some directives
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:13:53 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Bozhong Lin updated CXF-622:
----------------------------


reschedule to 2.1 release

> HTTPClientPolicy CacheControl type should accept parameters for some directives
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-622
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-RC
>         Environment: NA
>            Reporter: Steven E. Harris
>            Assignee: willem Jiang
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> Per section 14.9 (Cache-Control) of RFC 2616 (HTTP 1.1), several of the Cache-Control
directives require a parameter to make sense.
> "max-age" and "min-fresh" both require a non-negative integer parameter specifying seconds.
"max-stale" can accept a similar parameter, though it is not required.
> At present, the HTTPClientPolicy class will accept values of the ClientCacheControlType
enum, but has no way to accept these "delta seconds" parameters. Furthermore, HTTPConduit
doesn't do any special formatting in its setHeadersByClientPolicy() method to accommodate
such parameters.
> I suspect these cache control directives don't get changed much, but it's worth noting
that the present interface allows invalid values to be specified, insofar as the resulting
HTTP headers don't conform to the specification. Additionally, HTTP permits more than one
directive to be specified, per the "1#cache-directive" rule.
> Of  course, fixing this requires some care. It may be worth just punting and letting
the user specify the actual text of the directive, such as:
>   CacheControl="max-age=1000, max-stale"
> Capturing that in an enum is just too difficult.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message