cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "maomaode (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CXF-658) Tool dependecies on runtime components
Date Mon, 28 May 2007 06:35:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499483
] 

maomaode commented on CXF-658:
------------------------------

Excellent comment! Andrea,

I'm going to look into this approach.

And the ToolPlugin as metioned in your comment, will go into the API module,
And the jms.xsd will go into the rt/transport/jms module, and also in the jms module will
have an sub-class of AddressGenerator, 
And we need a AddressGeneratorFactory to look up the specific addressGenerator based on the
tools' argument 'ToolConstants.CFG_TRANSPORT'

correct?

And another thing i want to mention is that it's not just about address, we will need the
bindings as well (WSDL2XML for example).

Do you have another name for the ToolPlugin, since we already have a ToolPlugin for frontends/databindings
in tools?
Since it's about the Wsdl extensions, how about WSDLExtensibilityPlugin?



> Tool dependecies on runtime components
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-658
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-658
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tooling
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-RC
>            Reporter: Andrea Smyth
>            Assignee: maomaode
>
> In order to get schema validation working for all of our Spring XML extensions I wanted
to make some changes to jms.xsd.
> I was a bit surprised to find this schema not in the jms module itself but in cxf- tools-common
instead (and jms-context.xsd in cxf-common-schemas). 
> An attempt to move it into xf-rt-transports-jms revealed a dependency of cxf-tools-wsdlto
on this schema. This dependency is wrong and violates the principle of extensibility.
> If tools want to support generation of code/wsdl that involves details of a specific
binding or transport they should do so via an interface instead of hardcoding that dependency
into the generators.
> The concept of customising xjc with plugins is an example of how this can be done: the
generator/tool checks on its path for components that are able to generate address elements
for a particular address type "jms". If the jms module is on the path that is should implement
the bit that is needed by the tool,  fine, the tool embeds the result into whatever else it
generates.  Otherwise the tool fails with: "No processor found for adddress type "jms" or
similar.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message