cxf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bozhong Lin (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Closed: (CXF-606) MTOM Broken with Axis2 and .NET clients
Date Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:36:15 GMT


Bozhong Lin closed CXF-606.

    Resolution: Fixed

patch applied with revision 533412

> MTOM Broken with Axis2 and .NET clients
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: CXF-606
>                 URL:
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Chris Moesel
>         Assigned To: Dan Diephouse
>         Attachments: mtom_boundary_bug.patch
> A recent change to AttachmentDeserializer broke MTOM compatibility with Axis2 and C#
.NET clients.  The AttachmentDeserializer no longer looks in Content-Type to get the boundary
delimiters-- instead it looks in the message content input stream.  The problem is, it now
assumes that boundary delimiters will start with "----=_Part_".  This is not the case for
Apache Axis2 or C# clients, so it can't find the boundary delimiters.
> Axis2 uses boundary delimiters like: MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_6BC4984D5D38EB283C1177616488109
> .NET uses boundary delimiters like: --MIMEBoundary633131968239902899
> I am attaching a patch.  The patch changes AttachmentDeserializer to first look in the
Content-Type for the boundary.  If it's found, then it uses it.  If not, only then does it
look in the message content input stream.  When looking in the message content, it does, however,
still assume the boundary delimiter starts with "----=_Part_".  I'm not currently familiar
enough with boundary delimiter rules to write a better boundary detection scheme.  
> Nonetheless, this patch should make handling attachments more efficient (since it doesn't
always copy out the message content InputStream).  And, of course, it fixes the Axis2 and
C# errors too!
> A unit test is also included so this bug will never happen again. =)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message