Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E79160C05 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:54:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 97691 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2018 18:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 97679 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2018 18:54:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 18:54:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A2F1DC1A8D for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:54:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRDS-G-5XpwV for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl0-f54.google.com (mail-pl0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 549545FB20 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 1so1770567plv.0 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:54:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VCG1Ugy9fRSlqTm2xYZzXozISh2jsEvGHIBkw2YzT1A=; b=c23NxoX605DlqsOqctpiva6URoNFL7Alxg5rBJVxz3VeyicJDF4WguDrO6j4J1cqvT 801o32unv3pCSKwgJ7iOkekNDTo3kN9DiPgRrpsOQtCuHL0l4D/tzPD33zFX048u9y20 TeoZKOOru+oKBQ7IwrpXx9mxzFNfxJ44xb8zbyT395Cew6KQSXGwsMmDM5scHl6ReI1G 0dfHSR9s0se+CZoeSkkM3AqkvmePLUGU6qhK0ejOMSsKx+2/CtfGvMeoDhdvwP3YBbDv SDeWtTx+ssa81QoBxO+al9hYlR1A6dfeJYeGYQu/mKu0bBGMNOprVoUCqsPaih7ZtYbU 7KzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=VCG1Ugy9fRSlqTm2xYZzXozISh2jsEvGHIBkw2YzT1A=; b=lR5+G3a2aCR/nf3lv4lPvrCLJQPYp5Ul6Zy3LzqJByyc9yGaO1R35tIFYA1551PdU1 gU+u5cxotKMiqk7Z5hsx4Ot/Wed82weu5pwc5qw/HZ6W9QE3SIxhCmBwcj2fGnlaXsf8 G7hDHzLntsm7HFoQOXs5LY7LF3j8alsgnLuNZ7qH9IcABVOvH6H6Znz6Z2AYXtmcT2Pq mKOh8tiqSRmwPAxfxgr91ABgp/F+UkymInZyA8Zcb0k9YASco7kF7WnUKl3M6A/4trer J79rZvLHMUt/nyYbTbvSGevtqEzHvyHYq69Ow44aYyy6ZbV+X2sbJYO4X2bWwdCq2HoJ beYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKNIF+EYbJtv7ouv+yQRlPHAYy0Y3BdztYjb3XnrQ6/PFYgmYFD OyEEoIArgfgQFCNpat1kDZCBqgnE6M2g/khx5YE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot14DolnwFr4QE9t99OZXvk825FQlmICtQtA8HGVP0rX5k3UADkx9eusGFcv2pf1qPrGrciHag3UfICAy8T8fI= X-Received: by 10.159.197.65 with SMTP id d1mr2227761plo.58.1515005639037; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:53:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.186.176 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:53:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6ba0616c-d35d-6d25-ddcb-e79d694260c4@gmail.com> <7289103f-e180-f109-6375-7c67be43b376@gmail.com> From: Andy McCright Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:53:58 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MP client test failing To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043b4a08f295ea0561e3bcbf" archived-at: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 18:54:11 -0000 --f403043b4a08f295ea0561e3bcbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi John, Sorry for the delay, but yes, that is an expected validation. Thanks for catching it! Andy On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:18 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I pushed up a fix. Andy, whenever you get a chance can you take a look > and confirm this validation is expected as well? > > On 2017-12-22 08:16, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > Local, Java 1.8.0_144 > > > > Sergey > > On 22/12/17 13:05, John D. Ament wrote: > > > This is on your local or in jenkins? > > > > > > This was passing at one point, but I see it failing locally right > now. Will take a look. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On 2017-12-22 05:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > >> Hi John > > >> > > >> Consistently seeing: > > >> > > >> Method > > >> InvalidInterfaceTest.testExceptionThrownWhenInterfa > ceHasMethodWithPathParamAnnotationButNoURITemplate()[pri:0, > > >> instance:org.eclipse.microprofile.rest.client.tck. > InvalidInterfaceTest@17579e0f] > > >> should have thrown an exception of type class > > >> org.eclipse.microprofile.rest.client.RestClientDefinitionException > > >> > > >> I thought it was passing yesterday though... > > >> Cheers, Sergey > > >> > > > --f403043b4a08f295ea0561e3bcbf--