Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: CXF 3.2?
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
References: <E24CE866-51A7-49BB-937F-4E3259FB453D@apache.org>
 <CACLE=7NzfS142ncpjc=XA6AsnhjgUGfncB3tTZD0efkezYCzsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e12559a0-cfa8-7843-f2c8-13717af22cad@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:59:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACLE=7NzfS142ncpjc=XA6AsnhjgUGfncB3tTZD0efkezYCzsA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
archived-at: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:59:34 -0000

Hi Romain

CXF usually depends on the jaxrs one, not sure if it is problematic or 
not. Right now we have a final 2.1 dep, will only need to get an OSGI 
spec bundle (for Java 8 service loader mechanism - not sure either at 
the moment how that can be done given that all the specs bundle use the 
different technique at the moment)

Cheers, Sergey

On 10/08/17 19:31, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> do you want/need a geronimo jaxrs 2.1 release or will you just use the
> javax one?
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> 
> 2017-08-10 18:22 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> 
>>
>> It’s been over two years since 3.1.0 was released which is a long time.
>> I’d like to get 3.2.0 out shortly.   Looking through things, the major
>> outstanding things are snapshots of a couple deps (xjc-utils,build-utils,
>> wss4j) and updates to the JAX-RS stuff to use the released 2.1.   What else
>> do folks have outstanding that would be “needed” to get into 3.2?    Would
>> Sept 1st be a good target for getting 3.2 built?   That would give use a
>> few weeks to finish things up and get the releases out.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>
>