cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy McCright <j.andrew.mccri...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Gitbox
Date Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:05:36 GMT
+1 - agreed, low cost and it should make things a little easier.  Thanks!

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <coheigea@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 - makes sense to me.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > To move this forward…..
> >
> >
> > From my reading/investigation, the only “change” that would be required
> > post migration would be for everyone to update the URL’s for their repos
> in
> > their clones. (Change git-wip.apache.org -> gitbox.apache.org).   That’s
> > it.   So the short term impact would be minimal.
> >
> > What we would gain includes:
> >
> > 1) writable GitHub repo -  instead of pushing to apache, you COULD push
> to
> > GitHub.  Not a big deal for anyone though.  Most of us just do “git push”
> > and where it goes doesn’t really matter.
> >
> > 2) However, (1) allows using the “merge” button on the pull requests.
> >  For simple pull requests, this can be easier.
> >
> > 3) This also allows use of the “Close” button on the pull requests for
> > requests that won’t be merged.   No more “bogus/empty” commits to close
> a PR
> >
> > 4) It also would allow assigning reviewers and labels and such the PR’s.
> >  We’ve never really used those (since they aren’t usable right now), but
> > they could be useful in the future.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, would anyone object if I filed a ticket to migrate?   I don’t see
> > any major downsides as it’s just a URL change.   Do you think we need a
> > formal vote or is a lazy-consensus ok?      That said, even if we agree
> to
> > file the ticket, it doesn’t mean INFRA will approve it.
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 29, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <deki@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I already replied yesterday, somehow Ponymail seems not to deliver
> > > anything at the moment, so I try again...
> > >
> > >> We'd obviously all have to update the URL's for our local repos, is
> > > that it?
> > >
> > > Basically yes, I don't see any disadvantages.
> > >
> > > See this thread for experiences in Accumulo project:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3b50ac9e449b3f0621478bba9ee1ad
> > 01340800982b0e7af17ecff792@%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > We should continue using JIRA and not switch to GitHub issues.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Dennis
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message