cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CXF 3.2 support jetty9 only (drop jetty8 support)
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:54:43 GMT
Btw, what's the ETA for CXF 3.2 ?

2016-12-22 14:30 GMT+01:00 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:

>
> I’d be fine with that.   Everyone has pretty much moved on from the Karaf
> 2.x versions that only have Jetty8.   As long as we can support the Jetty
> version in Karaf 4.0.x, I’m fine.
>
> Dan
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:45 PM, Freeman Fang <freeman.fang@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > We have several issues(like CXF-7160 and CXF-7179) recently which is
> caused by Jetty9 & Jetty8 API imcompatible, though we should be able to
> handle this by reflection on CXF 3.1.x,  for the coming CXF 3.2 how about
> we support Jetty9(drop Jetty8 support)  only? This can relieve some burden
> supporting both Jetty8 & Jetty9 in CXF http-jetty transport.
> >
> > A couple of more reasons CXF 3.2 should support Jetty 9 only
> > 1. Jetty8 was EOL at end of 2014 and no further work on jetty 8
> > 2. benchmark showed Jetty9 is 30% faster than Jetty8 on server side due
> to the big changes in IO layers
> > 3. Jetty community strongly suggest to use Jetty9
> > 4. pax-web support Jetty9 for a long time, so align the jetty version
> seems more reasonable.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -------------
> > Freeman(Yue) Fang
> >
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>


-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Red Hat, Open Source Integration

Email: gnodet@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message