cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Beryozkin <>
Subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] Introducing Microbule...
Date Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:19:16 GMT
Hi James

While I certainly support the idea of having a given framework offering 
an option for the users to have a 100% portable code, which is a 
foundation, I also think SpringBoot (I refer to it simply because it was 
already referred on this thread already :-)) shows why it has become so 
popular - the last thing they care about is being on some standard line 
but what they care about is offer the features which will be important 
for their users and their users are rewarding them back.

I've been trying to follow the same path in CXF JAX-RS - offer a solid 
foundation for people to do 100% portable code, but do try as hard as I 
can add some extensions - slow at times I guess. I'm def not alone in 
this approach if we refer to Jersey, RestEasy. I encourage you to do the 
same with Microbule. Sorry if it sounds a bit controversial, hopefully 
not too much :-)

Cheers, Sergey

On 23/11/16 13:00, James Carman wrote:
> There have been certain providers in Microbule where I had to dig into
> CXF-specific areas in order to implement them (request timeouts that I
> wrote last night being one for sure).  I'd like to keep it pure JAX-RS as
> much as possible, though.
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:21 AM Sergey Beryozkin <>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> One thing which is worth noting that a portability of JAX-RS 2.0
>> Features (and indeed other providers) is only achievable if they are
>> also implemented in a portable way...

Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders

View raw message