cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] Introducing Microbule...
Date Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:21:38 GMT
Well, folks can use Microbule without knowing anything about CXF.  The only
thing you write is pure 100% JAX-RS code!  The internals of Microbule are
somewhat CXF-focused at the moment.  Obviously, I could provide other
implementation-specific (Jersey, RestEasy, etc.) bindings, but for now I'm
going to focus on CXF since that's what I tend to enjoy using :)


On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:19 AM Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi James
>
> While I certainly support the idea of having a given framework offering
> an option for the users to have a 100% portable code, which is a
> foundation, I also think SpringBoot (I refer to it simply because it was
> already referred on this thread already :-)) shows why it has become so
> popular - the last thing they care about is being on some standard line
> but what they care about is offer the features which will be important
> for their users and their users are rewarding them back.
>
> I've been trying to follow the same path in CXF JAX-RS - offer a solid
> foundation for people to do 100% portable code, but do try as hard as I
> can add some extensions - slow at times I guess. I'm def not alone in
> this approach if we refer to Jersey, RestEasy. I encourage you to do the
> same with Microbule. Sorry if it sounds a bit controversial, hopefully
> not too much :-)
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
> On 23/11/16 13:00, James Carman wrote:
> > There have been certain providers in Microbule where I had to dig into
> > CXF-specific areas in order to implement them (request timeouts that I
> > wrote last night being one for sure).  I'd like to keep it pure JAX-RS as
> > much as possible, though.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:21 AM Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> One thing which is worth noting that a portability of JAX-RS 2.0
> >> Features (and indeed other providers) is only achievable if they are
> >> also implemented in a portable way...
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergey Beryozkin
>
> Talend Community Coders
> http://coders.talend.com/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message