Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B548A200B84 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:41:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B3D45160AC5; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0560F160AA9 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 50033 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2016 13:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 50021 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2016 13:41:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3A9D81A997C for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UemUxqVHhJ4l for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0C9E060D39 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id w84so134881538wmg.1 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:41:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=johWqcAwuRTf9JLDV0gL+IPSMUdW8K0kUEacUhsmodI=; b=jVd7XqSYC/SicDeNDA77am3vLCkaMIqnpH2JIzSlq81XBLNGwUJ6cOyZGpCqSkhiws seDNl0Us2xoQ4psRDC2XP0VWcAELAabvyy+Sr1AeC8SJxzhadM6rD83GGz9nulvjwANV wai2Wdw14d8qOTogV13ciBPGB2ZRuj6nXCkWp2rX+5759HN1PfqFWcTQanBhylGe/Wc1 Gvf9azjS2O1k3+Vi338cViI8EWrfsfQli+BcmRR8LT8zrieD/rcScrCSHCnrmmNf4LNO nT3+i/abfKjtfgXdNNXuAJ7WBmyTp4/EZRFcXan/SuHZXtgCfdCe02XCSEOyAGsUUCyJ ZNow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=johWqcAwuRTf9JLDV0gL+IPSMUdW8K0kUEacUhsmodI=; b=RG6yv2SuptT1QU9e8O0EDg4ZmUQLwKgCpjCC3Gs15tkt21Gr8gBDpV3e4LpoN1+uSj Qf29vn3WnC5UXWoV5zZdxPGiPkzqG/v7ZKZtC6gblEedqJf7Y6SLN5aaFmMOmY8OljKB Bb0V+wKyLYzhZWOTspqUX3WKNeg9i0lXJJ3/1weF+2YCnS54WPlkKF1gJWm5zl2E8PK+ Vu71x0Y/mP6nXV4f0fNXKt4nn2mCsJFCHEDzrZc/+6mkZYeA81ztb9rO13SPZXmvJCXe JotbrHoFYuaWI7XrsjlvkyECkK7HLH5868usfGaKl2ZInQhdQdeBp9Fh1FDMw93itcDs PaVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPYceWYprMFPrtASic4S/MtA+qx15LRWpu6/KiAnlT4tH60whD7qTp/Szcacat1MQ== X-Received: by 10.28.27.78 with SMTP id b75mr3233971wmb.73.1474378868543; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.36.226.98] ([80.169.137.53]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g184sm27526948wme.15.2016.09.20.06.41.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Karaf 3? To: dev@cxf.apache.org References: <8555A97D-EA67-4BC0-93F3-AC284B1782A4@apache.org> From: Sergey Beryozkin Message-ID: <3fb01b00-bf1d-8de8-8666-8e79a71783e0@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:41:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8555A97D-EA67-4BC0-93F3-AC284B1782A4@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:41:12 -0000 Hi It may indeed make sense to drop Karaf 3 related modules from 3.2.0. Few other modules are being considered as candidates for being removed from 3.2.0 in the other dev thread - and as suggested there we can always restore the removed modules if really needed. Thanks, Sergey On 20/09/16 14:06, Daniel Kulp wrote: > Looking at Guillaume’s changes for CXF-7060, I have to wonder one thing: > > For 3.2, do we still need support for Karaf 3? Karaf 4 has been out for a while and I believe most folks have migrated. If we don’t need support for Karaf 3.x the changes Guillaume is doing can be simplified greatly and we can avoid all the duplication between the two features.xml files and such. > > > Thoughts? >