Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module
To: users@cxf.apache.org
References: <577A69F4.7060906@gmail.com> <577A6BB2.3080002@apache.org>
 <577A6CF0.6000704@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@cxf.apache.org
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Francesco_Chicchiricc=c3=b2?= <ilgrosso@apache.org>
Message-ID: <577A6D43.9070609@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:05:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <577A6CF0.6000704@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
archived-at: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:06:11 -0000

On 04/07/2016 16:04, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi Francesco
>
> Thanks, FYI, the initial commit only showed that the Swagger resources 
> were deleted :-)
>
> Here is the one with the newly added resources:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/commit/636252c2

Whoops :-)

> On 04/07/16 14:59, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 15:51, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own
>>> cxf-rt-rs-description-swagger module.
>>> It makes it easier for the users to choose between WADL and Swagger
>>> (example, right now if only WADL is preferred then no Swagger endpoint
>>> is there but not vice versa, having Swagger endpoint automatically
>>> adds a WADL filter simply because they share the same module and CXF
>>> tries to install WADL by default) and simplify the user dependencies
>>> (they'd only have to refer to this new module and not list explicitly
>>> swagger-jaxrs).
>>>
>>> So far it is only done on master, and would like to update 3.1.7 too -
>>> a minor migration issue is expected but the positive effect will be
>>> immediate. The fact that having a WADL filter for Swagger users is
>>> inevitable at 3.1.x can be considered a bug too
>>>
>>> If you have any concerns about a 3.1.x update then let me know please
>>> today.
>>
>> Hi Sergey,
>> definitely a good idea to clean up and separate things.
>>
>> Since Swagger is an optional extension for Syncope, I would also have
>> the chance to adapt its CXF configuration according to the changes that
>> will be part of CXF 3.1.7.
>>
>> Thanks for taking care of this.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>> [1] ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6760
>>> [2] http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/commit/21031e3a

-- 
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC,
CXF Committer, OpenJPA Committer, PonyMail PPMC
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/