Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17061183DC for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65158 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2015 15:20:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 65081 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2015 15:20:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 65070 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2015 15:20:58 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:20:58 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 5BF121A00C5 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so211908270wmv.1 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.87.99 with SMTP id w3mr79889566wjz.76.1448983257224; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: coheigea@apache.org Received: by 10.28.150.82 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1448982545485-5763443.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1448915407054-5763408.post@n5.nabble.com> <1448922666060-5763409.post@n5.nabble.com> <1448982545485-5763443.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:20:57 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question on wsu:id attribute added to outgoing request From: Colm O hEigeartaigh To: "dev@cxf.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102fae45527240525d7b4ef --089e0102fae45527240525d7b4ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 No. However you could easily write a custom interceptor to grab the security header from the outgoing request + add one. Colm. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:09 PM, dthomas wrote: > Thanks for the quick response.That makes sense. > > The timestamp is not signed. You mentioned that the wsu:id is not added by > default, is there an option to change the default behaviour and force > adding > the wsu:id? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Question-on-wsu-id-attribute-added-to-outgoing-request-tp5763408p5763443.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com --089e0102fae45527240525d7b4ef--