Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fixing up bean validation in OSGi
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
References: 
 <CALhtWkc4eYd7to9toPbTKU-e1Oq=eek-YPfd-shMCZJ04miPCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jbonofre@talend.com>
Message-ID: <566EABF5.5070308@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:45:57 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALhtWkc4eYd7to9toPbTKU-e1Oq=eek-YPfd-shMCZJ04miPCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Benson

On 11/12/15 16:19, Benson Margulies wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6706
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6705
>
> The changes I've committed for CXF-6705 make it possible to use bean
> validation, but ...
>
> 1: only with hibernate
> 2: only with extra code to obtain the validation provider.
>
> This raises two questions.
>
> 1: should I restructure the features to split
> 'cxf-bean-validation-hibernate' from 'cxf-bean-validation', leaving
> room for bval?

Please, I've heard Apache BVal is less complete, but I think we should 
keep the option open for users who would like to experiment with this 
Apache project

>
> 2: should I put the code in place that actually makes it work, and, if
> so, where? I think it would be an additional bundle under 'osgi' that
> provided a BeanValidationProviderFactory or a
> ValidationProviderHelper.
>
I guess the servicemix API spec bundle should help.
Hi JB, do you think a new BVal spec bundle may need to be released ?

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1618, in the description,

Thanks, Sergey