Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C8D618B64 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88742 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2015 17:38:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 88498 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2015 17:38:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 88487 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2015 17:38:18 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:38:18 +0000 Received: from server.dankulp.com (cn1.dankulp.com [64.85.173.253]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id EFD001A0181 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3093\)) Subject: Re: Question about start-level used in cxf's karaf feature entries From: Daniel Kulp In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:38:13 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E7778CE-99C4-4F84-A2F5-15425749318F@apache.org> References: To: dev@cxf.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3093) No real guidance, just =E2=80=9Cwhat works=E2=80=9D. For the most = part, =E2=80=9Cspecs=E2=80=9D and impls of specs are very early, (<=3D20) = most other 3rd party things are 25-35, CXF itself at 40.=20 Dan > On Oct 21, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote: >=20 > Hi, > while adding a new feature and making sure to use somewhat consistent > start-level for the bundles with the existing features, I noticed > there are several inconsistent start-level entries: >=20 > mvn:commons-codec/commons-codec > 25 35 >=20 > mvn:commons-lang/commons-lang > none 35 40 >=20 > = mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.xmlresolve= r > 25 30 >=20 > I think we should these should be aligned. But besides that, I wanted > to know if there is a more explicitly stated guidance in choosing the > level. >=20 > regards, aki --=20 Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com