cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: reduce CXF dependencies for JAXRS?
Date Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:28:35 GMT
Sure, that is why it is still a wish ;) but seems small CLI are more and
more common so decreasing the size would be good but doesnt need to be done
now ;)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-08-07 13:25 GMT-07:00 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:

>
> > On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > used an older version but xmlschema and woodstox removal would be good
> (why
> > not recommanded if I dont use XML parsing?)
>
> We use XML internally for various config things and setup stuff.   I
> really have no idea if CXF would even start properly without woodstox.
>  You’d have to try it.
>
> 95% sure it won’t work without xmlschema either.  Many cxf-core classes
> have xmlschema params/returns as part of the method signatures.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-08-07 11:18 GMT-07:00 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> >
> >>
> >>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You should be able to get rid of the wsdl stuff.    We pulled all the
> >> wsdl stuff out of core specifically for this reason.
> >>>
> >>> XmlSchema would definitely be required.  Way too much in core depends
> on
> >> that.    With 3.1.x, I’m not seeing a dependency on cxf-rt-bindings-xml
> >> either.
> >>
> >> I think with 3.1.x, the minimal for a client would be:
> >>
> >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf.samples:jax_rs_basic:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT
> >> [INFO] +-
> org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-http:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile
> >> [INFO] |  \- org.apache.cxf:cxf-core:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile
> >> [INFO] |     +-
> org.codehaus.woodstox:woodstox-core-asl:jar:4.4.1:compile
> >> [INFO] |     |  \- org.codehaus.woodstox:stax2-api:jar:3.1.4:compile
> >> [INFO] |     \- org.apache.ws.xmlschema:xmlschema-core:jar:2.2.1:compile
> >> [INFO] +-
> org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile
> >> [INFO] |  \- javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:jar:1.2:compile
> >> [INFO] +- javax.ws.rs:javax.ws.rs-api:jar:2.0.1:compile
> >>
> >> With some system settings, you could possibly remove woodstox, but that
> >> would be highly NOT recommended.
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> just a very open idea for now but I think it would be great to be able
> >> to
> >>>> use CXF JAXRS client with a bit less dependencies.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here the origin of the issue: I created several small "all in one" jar
> >>>> recently mainly simplifying rest calls (let take a github or jira REST
> >>>> client as sample if you want to see a concrete sample). Of course I
> used
> >>>> CXF for the JAXRS client - WebClient actually - and the only issue I
> got
> >>>> was the size of the jar.
> >>>>
> >>>> In my case I don't care about xml stuff (mainly use String as
> payloads)
> >> so
> >>>> wonder if we could get rid of wsdl, xmlschema, cxf-rt-bindings-xml etc
> >> as
> >>>> mandatory dependencies.
> >>>>
> >>>> wdyt?
> >>>>
> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel Kulp
> >>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message