Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.191.145.13
 which is an MX secondary for users@cxf.apache.org)
Message-ID: <553F5302.1010909@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:29:38 +0100
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cxf.apache.org
CC: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: The logic of Response getAllLinks method is not good?
References: <1430201994093-5756610.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <553F5261.1040006@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <553F5261.1040006@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

One more option "/post" ?

So is it "post", "../post", or "/post" ?

Sergey
On 28/04/15 10:26, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for this analysis, I'm looking at the docs, example
>
> https://jax-rs-spec.java.net/nonav/2.0-rev-a/apidocs/javax/ws/rs/core/Response.html#getLink(java.lang.String)
>
>
> it says:
>
> "A relative link is resolved with respect to the actual request URI that
> produced this response".
>
> What is the link value in your case, "../post" or "post" ?
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
>
>
> On 28/04/15 07:19, ellen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm using response getLink method from CXF.
>>
>> The code is:
>>
>>      private Map<String, Link> getAllLinks() {
>>          List linkValues = metadata.get(HttpHeaders.LINK);
>>          if (linkValues == null) {
>>              return Collections.emptyMap();
>>          } else {
>>              Map<String, Link> links = new LinkedHashMap<String, Link>();
>>              for (Object o : linkValues) {
>>                  Link link = o instanceof Link ? (Link)o :
>> Link.valueOf(o.toString());
>>                  if (!link.getUri().isAbsolute()) {
>>                      *URI requestURI =
>> URI.create((String)outMessage.get(Message.REQUEST_URI));*
>>                      link =
>> Link.fromLink(link).baseUri(requestURI).build();
>>                  }
>>                  links.put(link.getRel(), link);
>>              }
>>              return links;
>>          }
>>      }
>>
>> But from the code you can see therequestURI comes from Message
>> REQUEST_URI.
>>
>> If my request uri is http://www.test.com/resource/get
>>
>> then I continue use the link to invoke like this:
>>
>> Link link = response.getLink(linkName);
>> response = client.invocation(link).post(null);
>>
>> The url which response use is joined like this:
>> http://www.test.com/resource/get/post,
>>
>> but this http://www.test.com/resource/get/post is not exist (correct lin
>> should be http://www.test.com/resource/post). So I think this is not
>> good.
>>
>> I'm looking at Jersey getLink method, and found they use:
>> URI result = baseUri.resolve(refUri);
>>
>> to get Request url, and I found the result is correct for me.
>>
>> Could you please take a look this issue?
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/The-logic-of-Response-getAllLinks-method-is-not-good-tp5756610.html
>>
>> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>


-- 
Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/

Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com